Skip to main content
· 10/20/1982

Dadzie Ex Rel. International Kal-Sahara Corp. v. Leslie

Citations

  • 550 F. Supp. 77
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plaintiff fell within an “anomalous gap in the diversity statute which prohibits United States citizens that are domiciled abroad from suing or being sued in federal court based solely on diversity grounds”
  • “If [defendant] is found to be a citizen of any state at [the time the suit was filed], the court will then determine Kal-Sahara’s former principal place of business.”
  • “Thus, since before the filing of this lawsuit, Kal-Sahara has had no principal place of business. When it did operate one, plaintiffs assert it was in the District of Columbia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGLYNN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.