Dade v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding testimony about uncharged misconduct was proper aggravation under R.C.M. 1001(b)(4), because it showed “‘the continuous nature of the charged conduct’” (quoting United States v. Ross, 34 M.J. 183, 187 (C.M.A. 1992))
• allowing evidence in aggravation of the uncharged introduction onto a naval base of additional units of a drug to show knowledge
• allowing evidence of prior drug involvement in a conspiracy case to show the accused’s knowledge
• evidence of drug transactions not embraced by the guilty plea were admissible as aggravating circumstances to show the continuous nature of the charged conduct and its full impact on the military community
• co-conspirator’s testimony concerning five drug distributions in addition to the one pleaded to “was proper aggravation, because it showed ‘the continuous nature of the charged conduct and its full impact on the military community’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).