Dade v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding participation in an enterprise may be inferred from the circumstances and need not be shown by direct evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• G.M.P., Matter Of
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-09-21· cited 81×
• Avila v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-02-17· cited 53×
• Espinosa v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1995-06-01· cited 48×
• Marable v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-03-26· cited 17×
• Matter of GMP
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1995-09-21
• Charles Whitley Mick v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-06-02
• Curtis J. Hart v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-04-20
• Carl Leonard Lively v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-02-05