Skip to main content
· 3/13/1984

DADE COUNTY POLICE v. Metro. Dade County

Citations

  • 452 So. 2d 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court will not be held to have erred in failing to award plaintiffs the opportunity to amend their complaint when the record does not reflect that they requested to amend
  • appellate court had no jurisdiction to hear appeal of dismissal of civil theft count when other counts, arising out of the same transaction, still pending
  • dismissal with prejudice after three attempts to state cause of action not abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkdull, Hubbart and Daniel S. Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.