· 3/2/1988
Dachenbach v. Pamida, Inc.
Citations
- 683 F. Supp. 1268
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4229
- 1988 WL 44135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- removal improper where removing defendant was named in the original complaint but not served until after co-defendant allowed the 30 day window to close
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vietor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.