Daboval v. Daboval

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ineffective assistance where counsel failed to investigate crucial serological evidence
• Section 2244(d)(1)(D) inapplicable where “Petitioner was aware that serological evidence existed and was relevant to his conviction . . . [but] took no further action with regard to seeking out additional information . . . until [years later], when he filed a FOIL request”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).