Supreme Court of Delaware· 1/14/2009
Dabney v. State
Citations
- 12 A.3d 1101
- 2009 Del. LEXIS 14
- 2009 WL 189049
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a judge “clearly did not sentence with a closed mind” where she permitted the defendant to express remorse, heard arguments from both attorneys, and invited the victim to make a statement
- concluding that the judge did not sentence with a closed mind where the judge listened to the defendant’s claims of remorse, considered both attorneys’ arguments, and asked whether the victim wanted to make a statement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Berger, Jacobs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cruz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-02-19· cited 26×
- Longford-Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2019-06-27· cited 6×
- Dabney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-03-01· cited 2×
- Hohn v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-08-14
- Hickman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-09-10
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-02-18
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2023-11-07
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Weston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-09-30· cited 81×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-06-19· cited 28×
- Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1976-05-12· cited 20×
- Dabney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-05-23· cited 18×
- Osburn v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1966-10-27· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.