California Supreme Court· 11/20/1951
Dabney v. Philleo
Citations
- 38 Cal. 2d 60
- 237 P.2d 648
- 1951 Cal. LEXIS 186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he complaint does allege, 6 sufficiently as against general demurrer, a cause of action for imposition of a 7 constructive trust[.]”
- when quiet title and declaratory relief action based upon 25 same facts, only one cause of action stated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schauer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1970-01-20· cited 233×
- Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-09-15· cited 73×
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-12-31· cited 54×
- Stansfield v. StarkeyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-05-09· cited 46×
- Eichler Homes of San Mateo, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-05-22· cited 35×
- Calistoga Civic Club v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-05-19· cited 31×
- Hicks v. ClaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-02-16· cited 28×
- Lawrence Barker, Inc. v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-10-10· cited 21×
- Lucas v. AbbottSupreme Court of Colorado· 1979-10-29· cited 20×
- Gross v. NeedhamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-09-07· cited 20×
- Radspinner v. CharlesworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-06-10· cited 19×
- South v. WishardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-11-27· cited 19×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Metropolitan Engravers, LimitedNinth Circuit· 1957-03-22· cited 17×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Metropolitan EngraversNinth Circuit· 1956-11-27· cited 17×
- In Re Imperial Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal· 1984-06-18· cited 16×
- Continental Vinyl Products Corp. v. Mead Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1972-08-30· cited 14×
- Sullivan v. DunniganCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-07-02· cited 13×
- Harkins v. FielderCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-04-29· cited 11×
- Jud Whitehead Heater Co. v. OblerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-06-23· cited 10×
- South v. WishardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-03-03· cited 10×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court· 1945-05-29· cited 327×
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-10-23· cited 127×
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-11-25· cited 83×
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court· 1946-09-11· cited 72×
- Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-01-13· cited 70×
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court· 1943-03-11· cited 66×
- Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-10-20· cited 63×
- Willson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-03-03· cited 57×
- Wilkerson v. SeibCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-07-15· cited 37×
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-07-31· cited 37×
- Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-02-29· cited 31×
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-06-08· cited 30×
- Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court· 1947-12-10· cited 27×
- Simpson v. GillisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-05-17· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.