· 6/9/2011
Dabney v. Augusta Mut. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 710 S.E.2d 726
- 282 Va. 78
- 2011 Va. LEXIS 127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is well settled that performance of . . . a condition precedent to coverage . . . requires substantial compliance by the insured.”
- questions about whether insured substantially complied with the policy’s requirements generally must “be resolved by a fact finder”; only if the facts and inferences are “undisputed and certain” may the trial court resolve the issue as a matter of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leroy F. Millette, Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.