Skip to main content
· 6/9/2011

Dabney v. Augusta Mut. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 710 S.E.2d 726
  • 282 Va. 78
  • 2011 Va. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well settled that performance of . . . a condition precedent to coverage . . . requires substantial compliance by the insured.”
  • questions about whether insured substantially complied with the policy’s requirements generally must “be resolved by a fact finder”; only if the facts and inferences are “undisputed and certain” may the trial court resolve the issue as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leroy F. Millette, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.