D & W AUTO SUPPLY v. Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the doctrine “frequently *** - 26 - produces results which do not accord with facts or constitutional provisions”
• disagreeing with “the premise that the equality of the various branches of government requires that we shut our eyes to constitutional failings and other errors of our coparceners in government”
• stating the doctrine ‘frequently *** produces results which do not accord with facts or constitutional provisions’
• disagreeing with ‘the premise that the equality of the various branches of government requires that we shut our eyes to constitutional failings and other errors of our coparceners in government’
• “To countenance an artificial rule of law that silences our voices when confronted with violations of our constitution is not acceptable to this court.”
• ‘To countenance an artificial rule of law that silences our voices when confronted with violations of our constitution is not acceptable to this court.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).