D----R v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state medicaid statute subsidizing only life-sustaining abortions not inconsistent with requirements of Title XIX
• court granted state’s motion for summary judgment and held that Medicaid Act does not require funding of all medically necessary abortions, but only those when the mother’s life was endangered, relying in part on the Hyde Amendment’s language
• court granted state's motion for summary judgment and held that Medicaid Act does not require funding of all medically necessary abortions, but only those when the mother's life was endangered, relying in part on the Hyde Amendment's language
• state medicaid statute subsidizing only life-sustaining abortions not inconsistent with requirements of Title XIX

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).