· 2/11/1987
D. P. v. Stewart
Citations
- 189 Cal. App. 3d 244
- 234 Cal. Rptr. 420
- 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a statute identical to § 27 was “an express provision authorizing the adjudication of paternity in a RURESA action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.