D. Omar Valdez, Worldstar Communications Corp. v. James S. Feltman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a refusal to consider an issue would result in a miscarriage of justice where the issue was of “transcending public importance”
• holding that a party waives their defense when they fail to assert it in their general appearance
• holding that individual waived challenge based on Rule 60(b)(4), where he argued before the bankruptcy court only that judgment should be set aside under Rule 60(b)(1) and (b)(6)
• holding that the party waived its insufficient service of process argument by failing to raise it in its motion to set aside a default judgment in the bankruptcy court
• holding that movant seeking to set aside default judgment waived his lack-of-service-of-process argument when that argument was not asserted in his motion filed pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1) and (b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P.
• stating that “insufficient service of process . . . implicates personal jurisdiction and due process concerns”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).