D & M JUPITER, INC. v. Friedopfer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]s a general rule, it is a matter for the jury to determine if an intentional misrepresentation has been made by” one party to another
• “As a general rule, it is a matter for the jury to determine if an intentional misrepresentation has been made”
• “[W]here there is fraudulent inducement of a contract, the fraudulent misrepresentation vitiates every part of the contract, including any ‘as is’ clause.”
• “[S]ince the initial determination of whether there was a fraudulent misrepresentation has yet to be resolved, this issue is not ripe for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).