D. M., Father of K.A.M., Minor Child v. Department of Children and Families

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because the agency's decision was supported by the record evidence and reasonably explained, the agency did not act arbitrarily or capriciously
• “[T]he party seeking judicial review must have raised in its rehearing request before the Commission each objection it puts before the reviewing court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).