D & L SUPPLY v. Saurini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]t is true that inadmissible evidence cannot be considered in ruling on a motion for summary judgment,” but re- jecting an argument that summary judgment evidence contained hearsay because the party “failed to object at the trial court”
• adverse party must set forth specific facts in an affidavit or otherwise to raise any issue of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).