· 3/14/1932
D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. Popkin
Citations
- 285 U.S. 204
- 52 S. Ct. 322
- 76 L. Ed. 704
- 1932 U.S. LEXIS 845
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that \[s]pecific terms prevail over the general in the same or another statute which otherwise might be controlling.\
- \Specific terms prevail over the general in the same or another statute which otherwise might be controlling.\
- “Specific terms prevail over the general in the same or another statute which otherwise might be controlling.”
- “Specific terms prevail over the general in the same or another statute which otherwise might be controlling”
- “Specific terms prevail over the general in the same or another statute which otherwise might be controlling.”
- “Specific terms prevail over the general in the same or another statute which otherwise might be controlling.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Butler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.