Skip to main content
· 2/9/2024

D. D. v. DEPT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant failed to allege any argument whatsoever regarding a meritorious defense; defendant also moved for relief from default judgment under the higher bar of Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
  • “We read this to mean that the test is not whether the defendant will win at trial, but rather whether the facts alleged by the defendant would constitute a meritorious defense if true.”
  • approving constitutionality of Rule 704(c), the predecessor to Rule 7004(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.