Cytyc Corporation v. Deka Products

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while the “authority of a federal court to disturb an arbitration award is tightly circumscribed,” such awards are not “utterly impregnable”
• holding that while the “authority of a federal court to disturb an arbitration award is tightly circumscribed,” such awards are not “utterly impregnable”
• noting that an award \unfounded in reason and fact\ could properly be vacated even under the highly deferential standard of arbitrator review
• noting that an award “unfounded in reason and fact” could properly be vacated even under the highly deferential standard of arbitrator review
• noting that the manifest disregard of the law doctrine “arises in those rare cases in which it is clear from the record that arbitrators cavalierly disregarded applicable law”
• affirming the arbitrators' decision where the \panel's decision . . . ma[de] manifest that the arbitrators pondered the pertinent language of the Agreement and construed that language in accordance with the parties' discernible intent\ (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).