Cyrus Hashemi v. Campaigner Publications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no reason to test Rule 11 sanctions under amendment to 1983 rule not in effect when sanctioned conduct occurred
• finding no reason to test Rule 11 sanctions under amendment to 1983 rule not in effect when sanctioned conduct occurred
• rejecting claim, under virtually identical 1983 promulgation order, that amended Rule 11 standards ■ should apply “because the case was pending on appeal by the plaintiff at the time the Rule became effective”
• rejecting claim, under virtually identical 1983 promulgation order, that amended Rule 11 standards should apply \because the case was pending on appeal by the plaintiff at the time the Rule became effective\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).