Cynthia Schlapper v. Kreft Properties, LLC, Lisa Kreft, and Eric Kreft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Immigration Judge applied Joseph “substantially unlikely” standard to alien challenging mandatory detention status
• emphasizing that “the aliens in Carlson were not flight risks” and “had not been found individually dangerous”
• considering statistics on flight risk posed by non-detained aliens when assessing challenge to immigration statute
• upholding § 1226(c)’s mandatory-detention scheme against a challenge that alien detainees had a due-process right to individualized bond hearings
• \It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings.\ (quoting Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 306 (1993))
• Souter, Stevens and Ginsburg, JJ. concurring in part, “As a consequence, due process requires dissenting in part

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).