Cynthia Love v. Delta Air Lines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “issue of whether a statute creates by implication a private right of action is a ‘question of statutory construction.’ ”
• explaining that “legislative intent to create a private right of action [is] the touchstone of [the] analysis”
• explaining that criminal statutes do not provide for private civil causes of action
• “Raising up causes of action where a statute has not cre- ated them [is] a proper function for common-law courts.” (citation omitted)
• finding there was no private right of action for 14 C.F.R. Part 382 violations, as “attendant regulations” to the ACAA
• “‘Rights-creating language’ is language ‘explicitly confer[ing] a right directly on a class of persons that include[s] the plaintiff in [a] case,’ or language identifying ‘the class for whose especial benefit the statute was enacted.’” (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).