Cynthia Lee v. Thomas & Thomas, Timothy K. Gibson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that compensation for attorney hours expended subsequent to rejected Rule 68 offer were subject to lodestar calculation and “reasonableness test”
• “[A]ble counsel should aspire to achieve their client’s objectives economically, and counsel should not expect to reap financial rewards for prolonging litigation unnecessarily.” (citation omitted)
• “Counsel should not wish to reap financial rewards for prolonging litigation unnecessarily.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).