Skip to main content
· 3/27/2014

Cynthia Huffman v. The Hilltop Companies

Citations

  • 747 F.3d 391
  • 22 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 508
  • 2014 WL 1243795
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that arbitration clause did not expire despite parties’ failure to list it in the contract’s survival clause
  • holding that arbitration clause survived termination even when 15 agreement’s survival clause did not include arbitration clause
  • holding “parties did not clearly intend for [a] survival clause to serve as an exhaustive list of the provisions that would survive” because a “non-compete clause remain[ed] in effect for twelve months after expiration, yet it [was] not listed in the survival clause”
  • rejecting the expressio unius argument that the omission of an arbitration clause from a survival clause in an agreement constituted a clear implication that the parties intended the arbitration clause to expire with the agreement
  • discussing “the strong federal policy” and “strong presumption in favor of arbitration”
  • broadly worded arbitration clause in employment agreement applied after expiration of contract, even though it (and noncompete, severability, and integration clauses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Coor, McReague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.