Skip to main content
· 7/31/2017

Cynthia Fuller v. Idaho Dept. of Corrections

Citations

  • 865 F.3d 1154
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13818
  • 101 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,853
  • 130 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts must construe complaints “liberally so as to do substantial justice”
  • “Plaintiffs are not ordinarily required to plead allegations relevant to potential affirmative defenses to an asserted claim.”
  • “[I]f one participating employer fails to make a contribution to the plan . . . the remaining employers must then make larger contributions or employees must receive reduced benefits to cover the shortfall.”
  • “When considering the sufficiency of a complaint’s allegations under a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, courts must construe the complaint ‘liberally so as to do substantial justice.’” (quoting Hall v. DIRECTV, LLC, 846 F.3d 757, 765 (4th Cir. 2017))
  • “When considering the sufficiency of a complaint’s allegations under a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, courts must construe the complaint ‘liberally so as to do substantial justice.’” (quoting Hall v. DIRECTV, LLC, 846 F.3d 757, 765 (4th Cir. 2017))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Ikuta, Hurwitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.