Cynthia Albert, Jeffrey Beadle, Cecilia E. Comstock v. Trans Union Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• demand for “all appropriate relief for unjust enrichment under the laws of the states in which Plaintiffs reside” constituted demand for injunctive relief
• “There- fore, we approach the § 1292(a)(1) exception ‘somewhat gin- gerly lest a floodgate be opened’ that would deluge the appel- late courts with piecemeal litigation.”
• “There- fore, we approach the § 1292(a)(1) exception ‘somewhat gin- gerly lest a floodgate be opened’ that would deluge the appel- late courts with piecemeal litigation.”
• “[W]e approach the § 1292(a)(1) exception ‘somewhat gingerly lest a floodgate be opened’ that would deluge the appellate courts with piecemeal litigation.” (quot- ing Gardner v. Westinghouse Broad. Co., 437 U.S. 478, 481–82 (1978))
• “[W]e approach the § 1292(a)(1) exception ‘somewhat gingerly lest a floodgate be opened’ that would deluge the appellate courts with piecemeal litigation.” (quot- ing Gardner v. Westinghouse Broad. Co., 437 U.S. 478, 481–82 (1978))
• statutory exceptions to final judgment rule are to be narrowly construed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).