· 12/10/1992
Cyntha J. RESARE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, Etc., Defendant, Appellee
Citations
- 981 F.2d 32
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32278
- 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,908
- 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 709
- 1992 WL 361399
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that circumstantial evidence can be used to prove a discriminatory animus, \including comments by decision-makers which denigrate women[]\ (citation omitted)
- stating that circumstantial evidence can be used to prove a discriminatory animus, \including comments by decision-makers which denigrate women[]\
- establishing that the fourth element of the prima facie case requires that opposite sex employees doing the same or similar work were retained
- finding pretext when — despite justifying female employee's discharge on budgetary and policy grounds — decisionmaker admitted to not researching the cost-saving potential of discharging other, allegedly less qualified male employees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Brown, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.