Skip to main content
· 12/10/1992

Cyntha J. RESARE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, Etc., Defendant, Appellee

Citations

  • 981 F.2d 32
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32278
  • 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,908
  • 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 709
  • 1992 WL 361399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that circumstantial evidence can be used to prove a discriminatory animus, \including comments by decision-makers which denigrate women[]\ (citation omitted)
  • stating that circumstantial evidence can be used to prove a discriminatory animus, \including comments by decision-makers which denigrate women[]\
  • establishing that the fourth element of the prima facie case requires that opposite sex employees doing the same or similar work were retained
  • finding pretext when — despite justifying female employee's discharge on budgetary and policy grounds — decisionmaker admitted to not researching the cost-saving potential of discharging other, allegedly less qualified male employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Brown, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.