CWCO, INC. v. Superintendent of Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, in reviewing an administrative agency decision, the issue before the court is not whether it would have reached the same conclusion as the agency, “but whether the record contains competent and substantial evidence that supports the result reached.”
• stating that the “reviewing court must examine the entire record to determine whether on the basis of all the testimony and exhibits before the agency it could fairly and reasonably find the facts as it did”
• stating that the “reviewing court must examine the entire record to determine whether on the basis of all the testimony and exhibits before the agency it could fairly and reasonably find the facts as it did”
• stating that the “reviewing court must examine the entire record to determine whether on the basis of all the testimony and exhibits before the agency it could fairly and reasonably find the facts as it did”
• stating that the “reviewing court must examine the entire record to determine whether on the basis of al! the testimony and exhibits before the agency it could fairly and reasonably find the facts as it did”
• stating that the “reviewing court must examine the entire record to determine whether on the basis of all the testimony and exhibits before the agency it could fairly and reasonably find the facts as it did”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).