CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd. v. CWCapital Invs. LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “deadlines are [to be] taken seriously by 10 the parties, and the best way to encourage that is to enforce the deadlines”
• recognizing that “deadlines are [to be] taken seriously by the parties, and the best way 8 to encourage that is to enforce the deadlines”
• recognizing that “deadlines are [to be] taken seriously by the parties, and the best way to encourage that is to enforce the deadlines”
• holding that if plaintiff was “permitted to disregard the deadline for identifying expert 20 21 2 At least one other judge in this district has set forth the following five-part test for assessing the appropriateness of Rule 37’s exclusionary sanction: (1
• holding that if plaintiff was “permitted to disregard the deadline for identifying expert 20 7 At least one other judge in this district has set forth the following five-part test for assessing the appropriateness of 21 Rule 37’s exclusionary sanction: (1
• explaining that “[d]eadlines must not be 22 enforced mindlessly, of course”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).