C.W. Ex Rel. Wood v. Textron, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the \district court is the gatekeeper of expert testimony\ and that an expert's \reliability is determined on a case-by-case basis\
• ruling that the “district court is the gatekeeper of expert testimony” and that an expert’s “reliability is determined on a case-by-case basis”
• ruling that the “district court is the gatekeeper of expert testimony” and that an expert’s “reliability is determined on a case-by-case basis”
• explaining that the list of factors “is neither exhaustive nor mandatory”
• finding the point \well taken\ that studies at a certain level of specificity \are unavailable because of . . . ethical and moral concerns\
• applying Indiana substantive law, which required “evidence of general and specific causation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).