CVR Refining, LP v. XL Specialty Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 653(b)(4) prevents federal preemption of state tort law and worker’s compensation schemes
• holding that § 653(b)(4) prevents federal preemption of state tort law and worker's compensation schemes
• holding that, regardless of the state statute’s purposes, it is preempted if it “sufficiently interferes with federal regulation”
• holding that “any state law, however clearly within a State’s acknowledged power, which interferes with or is contrary to federal law, must yield”
• holding that “any state law, however clearly within a State’s acknowledged power, which interferes with or is contrary to federal law, must yield”
• holding that a federal law restricts ways in which a state can promote worker safety since the federal statute requires that state regulations be approved by the Secretary of Labor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).