S.D. Florida· 6/26/1992
CV Reit, Inc. v. Levy
Citations
- 144 F.R.D. 690
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18419
- 1992 WL 359207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that class representatives purchasing stock at the beginning of the class period adequately represented class members purchasing stock at the end of the class period because the claims arose from the same alleged course of conduct
- need for individualized damages determinations do not defeat certification of class in securities fraud action
- “[T]he courts have held that individualized determinations of damages do not defeat class certification.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gonzalez, Vitunac
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayFirst Circuit· 2000-03-31· cited 347×
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2007-07-03· cited 82×
- Walco Investments, Inc. v. ThenenS.D. Florida· 1996-06-27· cited 66×
- Cheney v. CyberGuard Corp.S.D. Florida· 2003-03-07· cited 58×
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesS.D. Texas· 2006-06-05· cited 55×
- Singer v. AT & T Corp.S.D. Florida· 1998-03-04· cited 31×
- Leszczynski v. Allianz InsuranceS.D. Florida· 1997-12-08· cited 31×
- Kriendler v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1995-01-31· cited 27×
- Duprey v. Connecticut Department of Motor VehiclesD. Connecticut· 2000-03-20· cited 27×
- In Re Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Securities LitigationN.D. Georgia· 2007-09-07· cited 26×
- Mowbray v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1999-10-15· cited 18×
- In re Managed Care LitigationS.D. Florida· 2002-09-26· cited 16×
- Nelson v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co.S.D. Florida· 2010-11-01· cited 12×
- Israel v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.S.D. Florida· 1999-02-08· cited 9×
- Wright v. Honeywell International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-12-10· cited 8×
- In re Recoton Corp. Securities LitigationM.D. Florida· 2006-12-07· cited 7×
- Drossin v. National Action Financial Services, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2009-02-02· cited 7×
- Ruderman v. Washington National InsuranceS.D. Florida· 2010-01-05· cited 6×
- Bruhl v. Price Waterhousecoopers InternationalS.D. Florida· 2008-09-30· cited 5×
- Hernandez v. MedowsS.D. Florida· 2002-08-26· cited 4×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,199×
- Blackie v. BarrackNinth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 871×
- Eisenberg v. GagnonThird Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
- Esplin v. HirschiTenth Circuit· 1968-09-30· cited 393×
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 325×
- Kirkpatrick v. J.C. Bradford & Co.Eleventh Circuit· 1987-09-15· cited 247×
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.S.D. New York· 1981-01-22· cited 172×
- Ruth Gilchrist, Cross-Appellee v. William Bolger, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Cross-AppellantEleventh Circuit· 1984-06-11· cited 157×
- Kennedy v. TallantEleventh Circuit· 1983-07-28· cited 103×
- Love v. TurlingtonEleventh Circuit· 1984-06-11· cited 85×
- Patrykus v. GomillaN.D. Illinois· 1988-08-08· cited 51×
- In re Amerifirst Securities LitigationS.D. Florida· 1991-08-08· cited 49×
- In re VMS Securities LitigationN.D. Illinois· 1991-03-27· cited 45×
- Gruber v. Price WaterhouseE.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-06-29· cited 36×
- Knight v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.M.D. Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 27×
- Linton v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc.S.D. New York· 1986-06-27· cited 26×
- Cooperman v. One BancorpD. Maine· 1991-05-17· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.