Cutting v. Cutting

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he final plan ordered by the court ‘shall be in the court’s discretion and shall be in the best interest of the child.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Simon-Harris v. Harris
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-07-13· cited 25×
• Heslop v. Sanderson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-11-25· cited 22×
• Barancik v. Meade
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-06-10· cited 19×
• Melton v. Collins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-05-20· cited 14×
• In re the Marriage of Thomas Leon Harris and Melanie Berlier Harris THOMAS LEON HARRIS v. MELANIE BERLIER HARRIS, Respondent-Respondent.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-10-28· cited 13×
• Dowell v. Dowell
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-02-19· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rombach v. Rombach
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-12-21· cited 56×
• Holmes v. Holmes
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-07-05· cited 52×
• Wofford v. Wofford
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-05-11· cited 22×
• Hollins v. Hollins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-03-07· cited 20×
• Pearson v. Pearson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-01-18· cited 11×
• Green v. Green
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-30· cited 9×
• Chapin v. Chapin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-01-12· cited 9×
• Manns v. Chapman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-03-09· cited 3×