Cutino v. Ramsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tolling statute applies to an out-of-state defendant even when service can be effected by substitute service on the Chief Highway Commissioner
• tolling statute applies to an out-of-state defendant even when service can be effected by substitute service on the Chief Highway Commissioner
• amenability to substituted service of process under § 15-9-350 does not render the tolling statute inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-09-22· cited 180×
• Watts v. Crawford
  California Supreme Court· 1995-07-06· cited 100×
• Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. South Carolina
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-09-22· cited 48×
• Langley v. Pierce
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-11-08· cited 45×
• Meyer v. Paschal
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-03-23· cited 21×
• Dandy v. American Laundry MacHinery Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-12· cited 12×
• Blyth v. Marcus
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-18· cited 10×
• Harris v. Dunlap
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-15· cited 8×
• Wilbur M. Langley Frances F. Langley v. Alan D. Pierce, M.D.
  Fourth Circuit· 1993-04-12· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• MacRi v. Flaherty
  E.D. South Carolina· 1953-10-16· cited 14×