Skip to main content
· 10/18/2010

Cuthie v. FLEET RESERVE ASS'N

Citations

  • 743 F. Supp. 2d 486
  • 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1013
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111192
  • 2010 WL 4103020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing claims for breach of fiduciary duty because plan design and plan amendment are not fiduciary acts under ERISA
  • “Absent contrary proof, class counsel are presumed competent and sufficiently experienced to prosecute the action on behalf of the class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quarles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.