Cutaia v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• use of negative or prohibitory language supports inference that statutoiy time period is mandatory
• \the legislature is presumed to be aware of judicial interpretations of a statute\
• “the legislature is presumed to be aware of judicial interpretations of a statute”
• legislature is presumed to act with knowledge of existing law
• statute which read that action \shall be taken\ by a local wetlands agency on applications within 35 days after completion of public hearing or in the absence of a hearing within 65 days from the date of receipt of the application held to be directory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).