· 1/20/1982
Custom Automated MacHinery v. Penda Corp.
Citations
- 537 F. Supp. 77
- 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 856
- 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10875
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remedy limitation failed its essential purpose when the seller did not correct the defects in its product “within a reasonable time”
- buyer not required to tell seller amount of damages as long as seller on notice of reason for withholding payment
- remedy limitation failed its essential purpose when the seller did not correct the defects in its product \within a reasonable time\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aspen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.