Skip to main content
· 9/6/1995

Custodio v. Parker

Citations

  • 65 F.3d 178
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30714
  • 1995 WL 523123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disposing of plaintiff’s claim because “he had no property interest entitled to procedural due process protection,” thus “preclud[ing] the need to address plaintiff’s Bivens / APA argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.