Skip to main content
· 12/2/1968

Cusimano, Inc. v. Cusimano

Citations

  • 216 So. 2d 344
  • 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where action was for breach of employment contract, prevailing party was not entitled to attorney’s fees absent a controlling statute or agreement between the parties although accountant was required to establish the debt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chasez, Hall, Regan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.