Skip to main content
· 11/14/1985

Cusick v. Phillippi

Citations

  • 709 P.2d 1226
  • 42 Wash. App. 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he standard of care of a [factor] has not been expressed in fiduciary terms in Washington, but certain duties have been recognized” including the duty “to adhere faithfully to all instructions” and “the rule requiring open disclosure and full accounting_”
  • absence of exclusive control when investors could have directed earlier sale of apples, and evidence established multiple possible causes of browning
  • section 551 is applied in actions for frauds or negligent misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.