Cusamano v. Alexander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating without elaboration, “[p]laintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment is premature because defendants have yet to file an answer to the amended complaint.”
• finding sufficient facts to infer improper motivation where defendant parole officer alleged stated that plaintiff had \opened up a can of worms with [his] letter writing campaign\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).