Skip to main content
· 1/24/2002

Cusack Ranch Corp. v. MidTexas Pipeline Co.

Citations

  • 71 S.W.3d 395
  • 2001 WL 1558360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying a de novo standard of review to the trial courts application of the law to the undisputed facts
  • applying a de novo standard of review to the trial courts application of the law to the undisputed facts
  • “We find the evidence, as a whole, establishes that Mid-Texas engaged in good faith negotiations sufficient to satisfy the requirement that it was unable to agree with Cusack on the amount of damages prior to instituting the condemnation proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Dorsey and Rodriguez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.