Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Diaz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that money judgments do not have \prospective application\ necessary to invoke relief under this rule
• noting that, for purposes of Rule 1.540(b)(5), “a judgment dismissing a plaintiff’s action for damages is not deemed to have prospective application merely because the plaintiff continues to be bound by it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).