Curtiss v. Bachman
Citations
- 110 Cal. 433
- 42 P. 910
- 1895 Cal. LEXIS 1076
Syllabus
<p>Injunction—Action on Bond—Counsel Fees and Expenses of Suit.— The liability of the sureties upon an injunction bond is measured by the terms of their contract; and where the damages are limited by the terms of the bond to such as the plaintiff may sustain by reason of the injune, tion, whatever expenses he is subjected to by reason of the suit, or for counsel fees in defending the suit, are not damages within the terms-of the bond.</p> <p>Id.—Counsel Fees, When Allowed.—Counsel fees incurred by defendant by reason of a preliminary injunction are part of the damages for which he has a right to indemnity; but only such counsel fees as may be incurred after the injunction has been issued, and prior to the determination of the action, can be considered as within the rule, and services of counsel rendered in the trial of the cause are not a portion of the damages sustained by reason of the injunction.</p> <p>Id.—Services of Counsel before Issuance of Injunction.—Services of counsel employed to resist a motion for an injunction rendered by virtue of an order to show cause why the injunction should not be granted, are not rendered by reason of the injunction, and cannot be recovered in an action upon the injunction bond.</p> <p>Id.—Unsuccessful Motion to Dissolve an Injunction.—An unsuccessful motion to dissolve an injunction does not authorize a recovery for the expense of counsel fees in making the motion, unless the court suspends its decision on the motion until the hearing of the case.</p> <p>•Id.—Preliminary Injunction—Effect of Failure to Sustain Action— Waiver of Damages.—It does not follow that because the plaintiff failed to sustain his action at the trial a preliminary injunction was not properly issued; and if, instead of seeking a dissolution of the preliminary injunction, the defendant prefers to defeat the plaintiff in his -action, he waives his right to recover from the sureties any damages -that he may sustain by reason of the issuance of the preliminar
Judges: Harrison, McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- LeFave v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-08-10· cited 25×
- Mason v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal· 1943-09-27· cited 23×
- Russell v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-03-14· cited 20×
- Klokke v. EscaillerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1899-04-14· cited 20×
- Hornaday v. HornadayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-12-28· cited 14×
- Ideal Heating Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal· 1951-11-26· cited 14×
- Alaska Improvement Co. v. HirschCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-12-14· cited 12×
- Chicago, Anamosa & Northern Railway Co. v. WhitneySupreme Court of Iowa· 1909-07-02· cited 10×
- Winnett Pacific Oil Co. v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court· 1924-09-15· cited 10×
- Artistic Hairdressers, Inc. v. LevyNevada Supreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 8×
- Spooner v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-05-08· cited 8×
- Robinson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal· 1935-03-14· cited 6×
- Adams v. National Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-01-29· cited 5×
- Lockwood v. SheedyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-02-20
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-09-30· cited 69×
- Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court· 1860-07-01· cited 53×
- Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-05-28· cited 49×
- San Diego Water Co. v. Pac. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court· 1894-01-31· cited 27×
- Bustamente v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 26×
- Gilman v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-11-20· cited 19×
- Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-05-31· cited 11×
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1860-07-01· cited 9×
- Sweet v. MowryNew York Supreme Court· 1893-09-23· cited 8×
- Whiteside v. Noyac Cottage Ass'nNew York Supreme Court· 1895-02-15· cited 8×
Other cases named Curtiss v. Bachman
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.