Veterans Claims· 10/15/1999

Curtis v. West

Citations

13 Vet. App. 114
1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1123
1999 WL 826231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that 30-day stay not required where Court found in favor of pro se appellant and Secretary had full opportunity to file briefs on issue in question
applying Linville and Rule 305(a) as basis for holding NOA timely filed with Court where it was received more than 120 days after mailing of BVA decision but where intervening mailing of motion for reconsideration to BVA had been postmarked on the 120th day after BVA decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ivers, Nebeker, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.