Curtis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We find the hybrid approach to be fair and sensible, and to comport with the requirements of due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jenkins
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-12-12· cited 31×
• Williams v. State Ex Rel. Harris
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-12-24· cited 20×
• Packer v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-10-02· cited 12×
• In Re the Contempt Hearing of Nasser
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-01-31· cited 6×
• Smith v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-09-29· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Oliver
  Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
• In Re Yengo
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-08-04· cited 58×
• In the Matter of Lemond
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-12-02· cited 56×
• LaGRANGE ETC. v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1958-12-09· cited 52×
• Allison v. State Ex Rel. Allison
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1963-02-05· cited 23×
• In Re the Marriage of Neiswinger
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-04-30· cited 14×
• Broderick v. Denbo
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-12-18· cited 6×