Curtis v. Paramount Famous Lasky Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although the wife’s income had increased and the increase fully replaced the amount of the spousal support award, termination of the award would not have been “just and equitable” under the totality of the circumstances
• explaining that the 1999 amendments providing for three types of spousal support did not \retroactively characterize or affect the spousal support award\ made before the effective date of the amendments
• $1,529 change in parties’ combined income reflects a substantial change in economic circumstances
• treating motion to terminate as motion to modify
• discussing effect of 1999 amendments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).