Curtis v. Jordan
Citations
- 110 La. 429
- 34 So. 591
- 1903 La. LEXIS 647
Syllabus
<p>ATTACHMENT — INTERVENTION—AMENDMENT OP PLEADING — DISMISSAL.</p> <p>1. While, when the ownership of movable property is claimed at law, the same degree of fullness of pleading and description of property is not demanded as in case of a suit involving ownership of immovable property, yet the party against whom the claim for the movable property is set up is entitled to demand amendment of the pleading so as to give such information as will acquaint him precisely with the nature of the demand he has to meet.</p> <p>3. And when an order of amendment is twice made» by the trial judge, and each time the amendment offered fails 1 to meet the requirements of the order, abundant justification exists for dismissal of the intervention.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting summary judgment to defendant on claims that plaintiffs failed to substantively discuss or defend in opposition brief
- “Failure to respond to an argument can result in waiver or forfeit of a claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blanchard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.