Curtis v. Interstate Brands Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “warrantless video surveillance of the curtilage of [the Defendant’s home], beyond fourteen (14) days violated the Defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy”
• \[T]he mere fact that the defendant filed a lawsuit against a magistrate judge does not establish a personal bias by the judge.\
• although firearms were observed more than a year before search warrant was sought, “guns have an enduring value to those who possess them and are likely to be retained for long periods of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).