Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
First Circuit· 8/13/1997

Curtis v. Duval & Harshbarger

Citations

  • 124 F.3d 1
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21330
  • 1997 WL 446878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the AEDPA modifies the standard of review governing issuance of writs of habeas corpus
  • finding that “recalling the jury for supplemental instructions after deliber- ations are underway is a critical stage of a criminal trial” under Cronic
  • explaining that the court may “raise the Teague issue on its own initiative if it believes that doing so will further the ends of justice”
  • suggesting that judicial immunity might be warranted in circumstances where prosecution attempted to intimidate potential witness or deliberately withheld immunity to hide exculpatory evidence from jury
  • stating that \comity and orderly procedure loom large\
  • reversing summary judgment in favor of defendant on Title 6 VII claim alleging sex discrimination in admission to company training program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Campbell, Lagueux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Curtis v. Duval & Harshbarger

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.